Types of Partners
The Manufacturing Readiness project served as a case study to determine the types of partners needed for success. Unsurprisingly, a delicate balance of organizational types works best, with each focused on improving its individual and collective policies for the benefit of the end user: the jobseeker. The types identified by the pilot were the following:
- Vendors or technology providers, such as SOLID, that work with JFF to translate skills to an appropriate badge and ensure that the technology to do so is aligned with a variety of standards. SOLID led the technical work of the pilot, incorporating feedback from partners along the way.
- Industry or sector partners, such as the Manufacturing Institute, to provide credibility based on industry-specific standards (in this case, standards from the Manufacturing Skill Standards Council). The Manufacturing Institute served as the project management lead and the bridge between the technical work and the community-based organizations (CBOs) providing training.
- Employer partners that understand the need for engaging workers with a variety of credentials and degrees. Such partners are searching for talent that is eager to continue learning and has proven experience, and they perceive LER badges as a means to signa across educational backgrounds, streamlining the hiring process.
- CBOs providing population specific resources to jobseekers, veterans and servicemembers in this case, are crucial partners. The pilot would not have been a success without Hire Heroes USA (HHUSA) and Heroes MAKE America (HMA). These organizations offer direct access to jobseekers and are strategic partners in ensuring jobseekers begin to engage with these digital forms of record keeping and skill signaling. In this project, these partners facilitated introductions between the Manufacturing Readiness team and their clients, inviting these jobseekers to test the platform and earn badges.
Among other activities, both HHUSA and HMA staff participated in orientations to learn more about using the Manufacturing Readiness platform and why it is needed. They fielded questions and collected feedback for the project team to use in real-time updates and evaluations. Their feedback was essential to all the partners, allowing them to collaboratively innovate based on proven needs. The experience suggests that collaborative information flow between partners provides the smoothest and most equitable path to wider and sustainable LER adoption.
The success of the partnerships in the pilot illustrates the need to include diverse backgrounds and voices in the development of LER ecosystems. The varied perspectives provided by SOLID, the Manufacturing Institute, the CBOs, and JFF all contributed to a robust pilot that engaged more individuals than anyone had anticipated. The pilot was successful in engaging participants and determining some key aspects of successful partnerships when tackling LER integration.